|
|
AFME welcomes the creation of the two new categories of benchmarks and the transparency introduced for their methodologies (which should nevertheless remain proportionate).
On critical benchmarks:
“The two-year extension is extremely welcome given the sheer number and variety of financial contracts linked to the two main EU critical benchmarks, EURIBOR and EONIA, which means reform will be immensely complex and much still remains to be done.”
On third country benchmarks:
“Despite their misleading ‘non-critical’ labelling under the BMR, third country benchmarks, such as non-EU Foreign Exchange spot rates, are widely used by EU financial firms and corporates in hedging commercial activities and investments abroad”
“Therefore, this delay is extremely welcome news, particularly given that the January 2020 deadline would have been extremely disruptive to EU financial firms and corporates who would have struggled to perform their economic activities abroad if these benchmarks were prohibited.
“During the two-year delay, we would very much welcome a revision of the third country regime under the BMR Review to rectify any unintended consequences.”