|
|
According to a report published by ALFI, carried out by Oliver Wyman, the introduction of the AIFMD has fuelled strong growth in European fund domiciles.
“The introduction of the AIFMD increased the attractiveness of European onshore domiciles,” comments Marc Saluzzi, Chairman of ALFI. “Whilst many were against it when it was first introduced because of the fear of high compliance costs and additional complexity, this piece of regulation has brought significant benefits, allowing EU domiciled managers to market authorised funds across the EU.”
The study identifies four main trends in the choice of domicile for alternative investment funds (AIFs):
1. Strong growth in European domiciles:
2. Demand for alternative investment funds under mutual fund structures; the usage of UCITS compliant structures for alternative investment strategies is estimated to have more than doubled since 2009 on a global basis. Demand for transparency and regulation post-crisis increased the attractiveness of UCITS structures. The number of alternative investment funds is estimated to have increased by 17% since 2010.
3. Domiciles offering “one-stop-shop” solutions attract funds at the expense of domiciles with less well-developed fund infrastructure. With the introduction of AIFMD fund, the quality of fund administration services has become a crucial element, together with the need for an independent depository. Overall the study therefore expects large domiciles to win over smaller domiciles with less developed fund infrastructures.
For private equity, Delaware, which is by far the most important domicile for this alternative asset class, is estimated to account for around 57% of the analysed 5,500 funds or 69% of the EUR 1.2 trillion assets invested in private equity. In the EU, Luxembourg holds the dominant position in private equity with 90% of the analysed EU funds domiciled in the Grand Duchy. Guernsey is the third largest domicile for private equity funds by AuM, seeing high growth in the last four years and today private equity funds account for nearly three quarters of all Guernsey domiciled funds.
Delaware is also the domicile of choice for the majority of real estate funds, with 67% of the analysed assets estimated to be managed by real estate funds domiciled in the US state, up from 60% in 2010. In Europe, Luxembourg has the highest share of real estate funds amongst the European locations analysed, with an estimated 15% of local AIF assets in real estate.
Looking forward, the report expects most of the existing trends to continue or strengthen over the coming years, fuelled by regulatory developments and investor demand.
Saluzzi concludes: “It’s clear from this that investors want the safety of regulation and we expect to see more offshore funds taking advantage of the AIFMD. After having attracted a high number of AIFM applications over the last 12 months (240), the challenge for us will be to attract more AIFs in Luxembourg. Cayman and Delaware are strong competitors but we believe our fund centre has what it takes to become the "alternative" product domicile for more and more fund managers and institutional investors.”