|
|
Insurance Europe said that, while the industry welcomes the work launched so far by the Commission in the areas of infrastructure and simple, transparent securitisations, these assets represent a very small percentage of insurers’ asset portfolios (2%). While a prudential treatment better aligned to true risks creates scope for additional investments, the Commission should not focus solely on those assets and ignore the other 98% of investments, most of which are long-term and crucial to growth and stability in Europe.
In its response, Insurance Europe warns that Solvency II remains a key regulatory challenge for insurers, because it wrongly assumes that insurers act like traders and are fully exposed to market volatility, therefore forcing them to hold unnecessarily high capital. As such, Insurance Europe calls on the Commission to address a set of straightforward and key questions, including:
Answering such questions would make perfect sense in the context of assessing the barriers to and risks facing long-term investment in Europe.
In addition to addressing Solvency II prudential barriers, the Commission should support the development of suitable assets in which to invest, such as infrastructure and private placements.
In the area of consumer protection, Insurance Europe urges the Commission to address the negative consequences of information overload and duplication for consumers and the mandatory default paper requirements for disclosures. Identifying a clear path and timeline to address these problems would be a decisive step towards making insurance regulation digital-friendly and future-proof.
Lastly, Insurance Europe acknowledges that a pan-European personal pension product (PEPP) may help meet Capital Markets Union (CMU) objectives, provided it includes key product features that have proven instrumental in providing European citizens with tailored retirement solutions (eg a long-term horizon, a decumulation phase).