|
The study analysed the liquidity landscape of European markets using data provided by independent analytics firm Big XYT and revealed that for the first six months of 2020, 81% of addressable liquidity was executed on-venue, 13% on systematic internalisers and 6% over the counter (OTC). Other key findings include:
AFME’s CEO Adam Farkas said:
“A diverse set of competitive execution venues for equities trading better supports the needs of investors, allowing them to efficiently allocate investments according to their specific needs. A robust market structure fosters financial stability by providing a reliable cushion during distressed market conditions.
“We believe financial markets regulatory policy should not value the commercial interests of any one type of market participant, including exchanges, dealers and other types of intermediaries, over end users. Instead it should be data-driven and focus on bringing benefits to end investors and issuers. This study provides a factual analysis of the share of liquidity between different types of execution venue and we hope that it will be used to understand EU equities market structure in a more substantive and detailed manner.”
Better data collection
AFME supports the substantial improvement of the identification of different trade categories, which should help ensure that regulators and policy makers are able to develop a greater understanding of the status of European equity markets. The European industry body commended ESMA, the National Competent Authorities and policy makers for their continued work to improve the quality and completeness of data.
Sean Barwick, AFME’s Associate Director, Equities, added:
“We remain committed to help in this difficult, yet critical task, and this report is part of our effort to support ESMA’s data strategy. We believe a formalised, more inclusive public industry wide forum would be invaluable to leverage market participants’ experience and contribution to improve data quality and availability. Furthermore, we believe improving data should be prioritised before considering more substantial changes to the EU transparency framework so soon after MiFID II implementation.”
This analysis was produced using data provided by Big XYT, an independent analytics firm, and can be found here.