|
|
ESMA’s analysis found that open access to (exchange traded derivatives) ETDs does not create undue risks to the overall stability and orderly functioning of European financial markets. As potential risks relating to open access are already addressed by the legislative frameworks of MiFID II, MiFIR and EMIR – the European Markets Infrastructure Regulation – ESMA proposed to the European Parliament and Council not to introduce an ETD specific phase-in regarding the access provisions of MiFID II.
Steven Maijoor, ESMA Chair, stated: “Trading venues and CCPs are important market infrastructures and crucial for well-functioning EU capital markets. Strengthening competition and choice between venues and CCPs is an important step to further the integration of the EU’s capital markets. The open access provisions of MiFID II will help to achieve these goals for all instruments without creating undue risks to stability.”
MiFIR introduces a regime for open and non-discriminatory access to CCPs and trading venues. These provisions cover:
This means that trading venues can clear their trades at the CCP of their choice and CCPs can access trade feeds from trading venues. Trading venues and CCPs may, however, deny access under certain circumstances as well as National Competent Authorities (NCAs) may refuse access to a particular CCP or trading venue. This is the case where granting such access would require an interoperability agreement for ETDs, or threaten the smooth and orderly functioning of the market – in particular due to liquidity fragmentation – or affect systemic risk.
In September 2015, ESMA has already submitted draft regulatory technical standards to the Commission further specifying the conditions under which access may be denied, the conditions under which access must be permitted and the conditions under which access will threaten the smooth and orderly functioning of the market.