|
|
The guide details areas of common ground, and explains how both regulators seek to ensure that member outcomes are not adversely affected by the differences in regulatory regime. Andrew Warwick-Thompson, executive director for DC, governance and administration at The Pensions Regulator, said: "Retirement savers have a right to expect that their workplace pension scheme, whether it is trust- or contract-based, is well-run and will deliver a good outcome. I can see no reason in principle why trust- or contract-based schemes should deliver different outcomes. However, joined-up regulation is essential to build equal confidence in both types of scheme, and this guide clarifies the various ways in which we and the FCA work together to improve the quality of all DC schemes."
Christopher Woolard, director of policy, risk and research at the FCA, said: "The introduction of automatic enrolment has meant that more people than ever are being enrolled into DC schemes and many employers will not have had to consider these issues before. While both organisations already work together closely, as the new landscape takes shape it is more important than ever that there is a consistent approach between the two regulators. The guide sets out how each of us will work to achieve that."
A series of quality standards for DC schemes, due to be launched by the Department for Work and Pensions, will set minimum requirements for governance, investment fund design and administration and offer a good level of protection for members regardless of the type of scheme selected by the employer.