|
|
The PCAOB issued for public comment a proposed policy statement that identifies the factors relevant to “full reliance” by the Board on the inspections systems of its non-U.S. counterparts that are sufficiently rigorous to meet the level of protection for investors that is required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
“The PCAOB recognizes that cross-border cooperation is fundamental to strengthening audit quality globally. The policy statement provides the architecture for the PCAOB to increase its reliance on the inspections of foreign counterparts, including our colleagues in the European Union,” said PCAOB Chairman Mark W. Olson.
The proposed policy statement provides guidance on the Board’s Rule 4012 (Inspections of Foreign Registered Public Accounting Firms), which permits the Board to adjust its reliance on the inspections of auditor oversight entities located in the home countries of registered non-U.S. audit firms, based upon the level of independence and rigor of those entities.
The proposed policy statement articulates certain essential criteria that further define the principles set forth in Rule 4012. If the criteria are met, the Board may place full reliance on the inspections programs of qualified non-U.S. auditor oversight entities. The Board seeks public comment on the criteria and the approach described in the policy statement.
If adopted, the policy statement would be implemented through bilateral arrangements which would set forth the anticipated progression toward full reliance.
Rule 4012 sets out five broad principles to guide the Board in making a reliance determination. These principles form the basis for the criteria outlined in today’s proposal:
- Adequacy and integrity of the oversight system – The Board would weigh whether the non-U.S. system effectively works in the public interest to protect investors by seeking to improve audit quality.
- Independent operation of the oversight system: The Board would weigh whether the entity and the system within which it operates are free from interference or undue influence by the audit practitioners and/or audit firms under the entity’s supervision.
-
- Transparency of the system: The Board would weigh the extent to which the entity is accountable for the discharge of its duties through a transparent framework. The Board would review whether the entity publicly discloses information on its structure, governance, policies and operations.
- System’s historical performance: The Board would weigh whether the non-U.S. oversight entity or the system within which it operates has a record of adequate disciplinary proceedings and appropriate sanctions.
Deadline for comments is
Guidance Regarding Implementation of PCAOB Rule 4012