|
|
The quest to create a genuine safe financial asset in the eurozone may have been going on a long time, but the need is real.
The current set-up, with German government bonds, or Bunds, at its centre, is a destabilising factor for the eurozone’s financial system.
Thanks to Germany’s budget surpluses, the supply of Bunds is increasingly slim just as investor demand for safe assets is rising.
In times of uncertainty, this scarcity creates an asymmetry of supply in the sovereign debt markets — with other governments selling more debt.
This imbalance enhances the danger of capital flight and the risks of instability in the financial system. All of this makes the work of the European Central Bank more difficult. [...]
The focus needs to be on a new kind of safe asset.
This should be a common bond sold by a multinational organisation which would partially replace debt sales by member states. There is already a body capable of this: the European Stability Mechanism.
The ESM, which is backed by all eurozone states, already sells bonds and lends the proceeds to sovereign nations. Its current remit only extends to countries enduring financial stress. If its mandate were to be extended, it could lend more widely.
The creation of this new safe asset would help to stabilise financial markets in times of turmoil and contain volatility in the spreads between sovereign bond yields.
The debt would carry the same basic interest rates that the ESM would pay on its existing issuance, and those interest rates would be equal for all.
There should be one main condition: do not beggar-thy-neighbour.
As a creditor, the ESM could be formally given a higher ranking than other lenders to eurozone governments. This, and a limit to borrowing by the ESM, would protect its creditworthiness and be an incentive for governments to pursue responsible fiscal policies.
The supply of this new safe asset needs to be large enough to meet demand and be liquid. Sales by the ESM should be co-ordinated with national debt management offices and, importantly, a well-designed transitional period is required to prevent shocks to national bond markets.
It would bring important benefits, creating a truly European yield curve and bonds which would become a global benchmark and be the main asset bought by European banks.
This, in turn, would allow banks to gradually reduce their balance sheets’ exposure to national debt without creating problems for member states. The amount of national governments’ outstanding bonds would fall over time as a significant part of the debt they need to roll over was funded by the ESM.
This would create the conditions to complete the banking union with a genuine European deposit insurance scheme, thereby creating a stronger European financial system capable of supporting the single currency.
The scarcity of safe financial assets and the fragmentation of bond markets are a crucial weakness of the eurozone.
If we are serious about reform that strengthens the zone and the international role of the euro, the time is ripe to evolve from individual sovereign bond markets by creating a European safe asset.
Full article on Financial Times (subscription required)