|
Drawing on insights from participating experts, academics
and policymakers, this first Policy Brief in a series of EPC
publications outlines how the debate on the Stability and Growth Pact
(SGP), the EU’s framework for fiscal and macroeconomic surveillance, has
evolved and the reform options that have surfaced.
There is
broad dissatisfaction with the SGP and how it has fared in an
environment of prolonged low-interest rates, missed inflation targets
and low growth. In February 2020, the European Commission launched a
review of the SGP in an attempt to address its shortcomings, but it was
quickly put on hold by COVID-19, when the fiscal rules were suspended.
Half a year later, the Commission is finishing what it started.
We
are in a drastically different world since the European Commission
launched the review. Not only has government debt increased
significantly, but regional, economic and social divides have worsened,
policymakers face inflationary pressures for the first time in decades,
and the Recovery and Resilience Facility and accompanying EU-level bond
issuance fundamentally changed the EU’s economic architecture. In
parallel, there is a widespread acknowledgement that averting, as well
as adapting to, the climate crisis requires a steep increase in public
investment.
Thanks to the EPC Task Force’s ongoing work,
Francesco De Angelis and Frederico Mollet can pinpoint the SGP’s major
flaws, post-COVID-19 challenges, and five broad categories of reform
options: