|
|
What citizens need is not more spin for or against a federal Europe. It is to be told by their leaders what can and cannot be done at national and European level, and why; what they receive for “more Europe”; and what is the trade-off for “more solidarity” in terms of lost sovereignty, well-being – primarily, in terms of jobs – and a voice in world affairs. Why would they applaud more integration if the loss in national strength is not compensated with stronger, more efficient and more democratic decisions at EU level? Even more vital: who is telling citizens that a more united Europe requires strong nations, where people are proud of their identity and there is national consensus to solve the toughest problems? We need strong nations to fight nationalism.
These issues are not addressed by Mr Cameron, François Hollande of France or Germany’s Angela Merkel. The UK prime minister is using Europe for political expediency. Ms Merkel calls for more unity as long as it is on German terms and lacks content. As for Mr Hollande, he has simply revived the slogan of European economic government for the eurozone, a proposal launched years ago – without saying it implies creating a supranational body, about which no French government, left or right, has shown enthusiasm. His abrupt response last week to European Commission recommendations that France make progress with much-needed structural reforms speaks for itself.
As long as leaders avoid broaching these questions honestly, they should not be surprised if citizens believe Europe is not the solution but the problem and take refuge in nationalistic, xenophobic, populist and protectionist mirages. Conversely, if they do, they might find it strengthens not only Europe’s interests but also the chances of their own political survival.
Full article (FT subscription required)