Expert Group publishes final report on debt redemption fund and eurobills

31 March 2014

The final report concludes that both a debt redemption fund/pact and eurobills would have merits in stabilising government debt markets, supporting monetary policy transmission and promoting financial stability and integration, although in different ways and with different long-term implications.

President José Manuel Barroso and Vice-President Olli Rehn, responsible for Economic and Monetary Affairs and the Euro, have today received the final report of the Commission's Expert Group on a debt redemption fund and eurobills. The Commission established the Expert Group in July 2013 to deepen the analysis on the possible merits, risks, requirements and obstacles of partial substitution of national issuance of debt through joint issuance in the form of a redemption fund and eurobills. This decision followed a commitment made by the Commission to the European Parliament as part of the overall agreement on the 'Two-Pack' economic governance legislation, in the Declaration of the Commission of 12 March 2013.
 
Key conclusions
 
The final report concludes that both a debt redemption fund/pact and eurobills would have merits in stabilising government debt markets, supporting monetary policy transmission and promoting financial stability and integration, although in different ways and with different long-term implications.
 
However, these merits would be coupled with economic, financial and moral hazard risks, and the trade-offs would depend on various design options. Given the very limited experience with the EU’s reformed economic governance, the Expert Group's report says it may be considered prudent to first collect evidence on the efficiency of that governance before any decisions on schemes of joint issuance are taken.
 
Concerning legal issues, the Expert Group's report concludes that without EU Treaty amendments, joint issuance schemes could be established only in a pro rata form, and - at least for the debt redemption fund/pact - only through a purely intergovernmental construction, which would raise democratic accountability issues. Treaty amendments would be necessary to set up joint issuance schemes including joint and several liability, certain forms of protection against moral hazard and appropriate attention to democratic legitimacy, the report says. 
 
The report does not formulate policy proposals or recommendations, nor endorse explicitly or implicitly either of the two ideas.

President Barroso said: "I would like to thank Gertrude Tumpel-Gugerell and the members of the Expert Group for today’s excellent report, which is a welcome contribution to this debate. As the report makes clear, creating a debt redemption fund or eurobills would require deep political reflection and possible changes to the EU Treaty – at least for the more far-reaching options. The Commission will carefully study the report and decide how to follow it up in due course. But before we do, we need to have a democratic debate on these ideas with citizens, governments and the European Parliament."

Vice President Rehn said: "Over the last few years, we have created a full cycle of economic policy coordination in Europe, with further steps for the euro area. Member States increasingly regard their economic policies as a matter of common concern – as it should be in a monetary union. While these achievements do not yet constitute the final stage of the Economic and Monetary Union, we have virtually exhausted the options under the current Treaty. Any steps to further solidarity should go hand-in-hand with greater fiscal responsibility and integration. The Expert Group presented an extensive assessment of the merits and risks of possible ideas in this direction. This analysis will enrich the wider debate on further institutional reform and its economic and legal foundations, which can only emerge through a profoundly democratic process at national and at European level."

Press release
 
Conclusions of the Expert Group
 
Full report of the Expert Group

© European Commission