|
|
This relationship could be based on four pillars:
MEPs insist that the framework should include consistent governance, with a robust dispute resolution mechanism.
The resolution, prepared by the EP Brexit Steering Group, stresses the uniqueness of the EU ecosystem with its binding common rules, common institutions and common supervisory, enforcement and adjudicatory mechanisms. This means that even closely-aligned non-EU countries with identical legislation cannot enjoy similar rights, benefits or market access to those of EU member states.
Any framework for the future relationship would also need to respect the integrity of the internal market, customs union and four freedoms, without allowing for a sector-by-sector approach (cherry-picking EU laws). It should preserve the EU’s independent decision-making and legal order, including the role of the ECJ.
Withdrawal agreement and transitional period
The resolution welcomes the Commission’s 28 February draft of the Withdrawal agreementand expresses support for the transitional arrangements proposed.
It also reiterates the importance of securing equal and fair treatment for EU citizens living in the UK and British citizens living in the EU.
The resolution welcomes the European Commission’s draft protocol on Ireland and Northern Ireland including its backstop option outlined in the December Joint Report that provides a concrete fallback solution against any hardening of the border and preserves the North-South cooperation. MEPs also underline the importance of the British government ensuring there will be no diminution of the rights of citizens as set out in the Good Friday Agreement. [...]
Comment by Andrew Duff on EurActiv: Duff: post-Brexit association agreement one step closer