|
Although an EU-wide
agreement with the UK that ensures free movement remains the ideal
solution, it is currently unrealistic. This calls for an evaluation of
possible alternatives.
Bilateral agreements should be explored
and examined as a possible alternative to an EU-wide agreement with the
UK to facilitate and govern cross-border mobility. Various bilateral
free movement agreements across Europe show that their use is not only
legal but also habitual. They offer flexibility when it comes to the
rights of entry, residency and work, as well as other important rights.
And they could also be used as a foundation upon which to build an
agreement between the EU as a whole and the UK, if not to facilitate the
rebuilding of mutual trust.
Migration law expert Diego Acosta
makes a further case for Spain being the first possible candidate for a
post-Brexit bilateral free movement agreement concluded between an EU
member state and the UK. Spain is the most important EU destination for
British emigrants, and British migrants residing in Spain constitute the
latter’s third-largest non-national population. In turn, the UK is the
most important migrant destination for Spanish nationals worldwide, who
represent the fifth-largest migrant group from the EU. He offers
concrete suggestions as to what a bilateral treaty between Spain and the
UK could include.
In addition, governments of EU member states
that have important reciprocal migration flows with the UK, as well as
the UK government, should consider the following recommendations when
exploring the possibility of adopting bilateral agreements on migration: