|
The passing of Elizabeth II and the accession of
Charles III have coincided with the appointment of a new Prime Minister,
Liz Truss.
It is the end of an era, and therefore a new one for Britain.
The 70th anniversary of Queen Elizabeth's reign marked a special page in
British history. The undisputed victor in the fight against Nazism,
Britain emerged from the Second World War weakened and in debt, and had
to deconstruct the world's largest empire, which then numbered 400
million people. Its tenacity and openness to the world enabled it to
recover and rise to the rank of 5th world economic power. Then came the
divisions, those of Brexit, of its increasingly disunited nations, the
antics of some of the junior members of the royal family, its isolation
just a stone's throw from Europe, the costly buffoonery of some
whimsical elected officials.
She who, in the 1940s, was a rescuer in the bombings of London and whom
Winston Churchill introduced to the convoluted rules of constitutional
monarchy, was able to embody the unity of the Kingdom on all these
occasions because Her Majesty symbolised the glorious history of her
country and a link with its present. She was the monarch of nostalgia
wrapped in great finesse and intelligence, draped in eloquent silences.
Thanks to her, the British monarchy will continue to reign over these
globalized islands through her son, who has had time to acquire immense
experience in international affairs. He will modernise it at a time when
the country has appointed a new Prime Minister, who is also determined
to act on her own and in a pragmatic rather than ideological manner.
She has just demonstrated this by announcing, despite her previous
statements, a massive support plan for her citizens and businesses to
contain soaring energy costs by mobilising more than £100 billion of
public funds.
It is also likely that the government will not want to embarrass itself
with a conflict with the European Union, which it has fuelled by
reneging on the commitments it made to Ireland when it signed the treaty
of separation from the continent.
On the contrary, we can hope that it will discreetly normalise its
relations with the 27, which will not ask for confessions, without
challenging the Brexit vote, which is now favoured by a minority in the
country. It is in its interest and that of its fellow citizens to face
the crisis and Putin.
For the British, in addition to the sadness and emotion, it is therefore a clear, hard shift that is taking place.
The post-war period, which coincided with the reign of its late
sovereign, has ended abruptly. The British used to pride themselves on
being the only ones in Europe to be on the winning side of the Second
World War, looking down on the 'coalition of losers' that the European
Union represented in their eyes. That era is over; that chapter closed.
And their current economic and social difficulties are all the more
daunting because they have chosen to face them alone.
The country has all the assets to take up the challenge if it recaptures
the pragmatism that has long characterised it and breaks with the
dogmatism of a populism that has worn it down. The pomp and circumstance
surrounding the tributes to the Queen must not mask or delude us, but
the United Kingdom is perfectly able to offer us a new face.