|
This is a key conclusion in the latest edition of The GRI Perspective: Auditing to save the planet: the battle against greenwashing. Statements on socio-economic performance can no longer be used primarily as marketing gimmicks; the professionalization of sustainability auditing has already begun.
Much in the same way as international accounting rules led to mandatory auditing of financial data becoming normal practice, a system in which financial and sustainability reporting are on an equal footing will mean both data sets need to the same assurance.
With an array of global and national sustainability frameworks and approaches to consider, as well as capacity limits for the auditing profession, this transition requires standard setters to work together, to establish a clear system for disclosure that leads to comparable data.
GRI and the IFRS Foundation are already collaborating to achieve interoperability between the GRI Standards and new standards from the ISSB (International Sustainability Standards Board). This recognizes the two distinct yet inter-related approaches, covering both impact materiality (GRI) and financial materiality (ISSB).
Eelco van der Enden, CEO of GRI, said:
Consolidating best practice on a global level is an important stage in the professionalization of sustainability reporting auditing. GRI therefore welcomes that the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) is developing a standard for sustainability reporting assurance. GRI’s Global Sustainability Standards Board has commenced dialogue with the IAASB and committed to contribute technical expertise to the project.