WWF: EU Recovery Package: "repair & prepare" not yet fully green and fair

28 May 2020

The EU Recovery Package presented by the European Commission today has reconfirmed its ambition to achieve the European Green Deal, but many key elements including the role of nature are still missing, and backdoors seem to be left open for unsustainable investments to continue.

The package consists of a revised EU budget (MFF) proposal that includes additional recovery funds, with an overall value of 1.85 trillion EUR.

"Today's announcements are an effort to uphold President von der Leyen's pledge to make the Green Deal the 'motor' of economic recovery.  Unfortunately, half the motor is still missing, so this recovery looks set to stall," said Ester Asin, Director of the WWF European Policy Office. "In particular, we are missing clear mechanisms for implementing and enforcing the green conditions to truly ensure that no money spent by Member States will go to harmful activities such as fossil fuels or building new airports and motorways."

While the Commission names a number of sectors crucial for the creation of green jobs - such as energy efficiency and renewable energy -, little clarity is given on the overall share of funding to these, and direct investments in nature are mostly missing. It also proposes to introduce guidance on 'green strings' for any EU support to companies (via investEU), but there is no assurance that the overall package will adhere to the 'do no harm' principle of the European Green Deal.

"The proposal is titled 'Repair and Prepare for the next generation', but much reparation will still be needed to deliver on the environmental and climate promises. Thousands of young people want way more: a complete overhaul of our relationship with nature and the climate," concluded Ester Asin. "The EU Member States and MEPs must now get out their toolboxes and ensure that our economic recovery is truly green and just, not just on paper. This is what millions of Europeans have been calling for."

Since the beginning of the crisis, WWF has stated unequivocally that a truly green recovery must not support activities that are harmful to the environment; that it should include substantial investments into zero-carbon sectors and nature restoration - at least 50% of the total; that it should reinstate the climate spending target under the current EU budget by the end of 2020; and that it should use the EU Taxonomy to identify the activities that should be supported in order to reach these targets.

• While the 'do no harm' principle is mentioned once, and the Commission says that "support should be consistent with the Union's climate and environmental objectives", there is no clarity on how this would be operationalised. Further, the principle seems to apply only to public investments in the recovery,  and not the 1.1 trillion EUR of the EU budget, thus leaving the door open to EU financing of polluting sectors.
• The Commission commits to use the taxonomy to guide investments in the EU's recovery, but only for the recovery funds, not for the MFF. This leaves big questions on how exactly the taxonomy will be applied to MFF expenditure and requires urgent clarification.
• Regarding climate and environment spending in the MFF, the Commission missed the mark by continuing to stand by its earlier proposal of 25% spending on climate action only, rather than increasing the target. Previously, the Parliament has already asked for a target higher than 30%.
• The Commission reinstates the 25% climate target of the current MFF, but mentions "flexibility" for Cohesion Policy, resulting in no climate earmarking, which would be a major roll-back on past agreements. This is totally counterproductive to the Green Deal's objectives and should be reversed. In addition, funding will be increased by an additional 55 billion EUR (up to 2022) with no clear spending criteria attached.

There is also a proposal to increase the Just Transition Fund to €40 billion. While this is important and very welcome, the Fund must explicitly exclude all fossil fuels and cannot replace the other sources of financing and company investments that are crucial to help regions move away from high-carbon activities.

The Commission has so far authorised 2 trillion euros in state aid by member states, without requiring meaningful green conditions. Worryingly, it failed to provide clearer guidance today. It should require member states to at least make support conditional on large companies in high-carbon sectors producing credible plans to transition to a zero-carbon business model. This lax approach risks even bigger sums of state aid going to polluters.

While the Commission mentions the needs to unlock investment in clean technologies and value chains to ensure the decarbonisation of EU industries, little is given on how to achieve these sustainable pathways. EU must make funding to energy-intensive industries (particularly large industrial companies) conditional on their having a carbon-neutrality transition plans. Decisions taken today will have impacts on what is possible as far away as 2040

 

more at EU Business