BIS: Challenges of the Basel framework for emerging market, developing and small economies

14 November 2014

This paper assesses the potential impact and implementation challenges and outlines practical steps that can be taken by authorities to implement global standards.

The Financial Stability Board (FSB), in collaboration with standard-setting bodies (SSBs) and international financial institutions (IFIs), has been monitoring the effects of regulatory reforms on emerging markets and developing economies (EMDEs). Following the study by the FSB and IFIs in June 2012, and while fully supporting the implementation of the agreed regulatory reforms to achieve a safer financial system, the G20 encouraged the FSB (in coordination with SSBs, IFIs and national authorities) to continue assessing the potential unintended consequences on EMDEs and providing policy advice to mitigate them.

An update of the 2012 study was published by the FSB in September 2013. The main takeaways of this report were:

IFIs and the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) are increasingly focusing on the implementation of Basel III reforms. IFIs continue developing additional guidance and identifying good practices of reform implementation for EMDEs, monitoring these issues in the context of their surveillance work, and providing technical assistance to evaluate the adequacy and sequencing of the regulatory reforms. The Basel Committee is monitoring the timely adoption of Basel III standards, its quantitative impact on banks and the consistency of implementation among its members.

The BCBS also expanded its outreach and consultation across jurisdictions on the impact of Basel III, and the Basel framework more generally. The Basel Consultative Group (BCG), the main outreach group of the BCBS, established a work stream to identify the impact of BCBS standards implementation on emerging market, developing and small Economies (“EMDEs and small economies”).

This report presents the findings and recommendations of the BCG. Broadly, the BCG would like to highlight the increasing importance of defining an “internationally active bank” as being the primary target of implementation of reforms. This is particularly important given the complexity of reforms and the reinforcement of the proportionality concept in the 2012 Basel´Core Principles. 

Full working paper


© BIS - Bank for International Settlements