Draft Report of the Platform on Sustainable Finance on a Social Taxonomy: EBF response
14 September 2021
The Social Taxonomy should remain a voluntary tool for both financial and non-financial undertakings to guide their positive societal impact
- A balanced ambitious and robust framework is needed, and it must
clearly define what can be considered socially sustainable in doing
business, also from the point of view of corporate lenders who want to
have a positive social impact.
- The Social Taxonomy should focus on the value added through the
additionality of social impact in a company’s main activities and not
become an all-encompassing ESG taxonomy. Such a taxonomy would end up
classifying as social any business with social policies in place for
their operations.
- The EBF welcomes the intended consistency with upcoming legislation,
e.g. on Sustainable Corporate Governance, the CSRD as well as already
existing market guidance on the Social Bonds Standard.
- It is important that the taxonomy clearly delineate its geographical
focus (EU vs. global level); in particular reflecting on what impact it
aims to create outside the EU.
EBF
© EBF