|
Graham sets out the 2014 timeline for the political, financial, economic and budgetary fields, with a focus on the forthcoming EU elections. [View original document]
By the end of 2014, the EU will have a new Commission, a new Parliament, further economic integration of the euro area coupled with an effective banking union (even if it is not as complete as many had hoped). The May elections to the European Parliament could well turn out to be something of a plebiscite on the conduct of the crisis, and the result in the UK may have sent a strong signal about the chances of the UK remaining a member of the EU.
Accordingly, GrahamBishop.com is launching its new monitor of up-coming events along the 2014 Timeline. Updates will be available on our website as we roll out additional content.
In this section, we will list the postings to this document in the last 14 days (approx.) with a dynamic link so that you can jump straight to the new item.
22.-25.5.2014: EUROPEAN ELECTIONS
Source: TNS/Scytl in cooperation with the European Parliament
19.5.2014: The Times (subscription) reports that Number 10 is trying to block the German Socialist Martin Schulz' bid to become the next European Commission President, over his anti-reform views and fears that it would land a serious blow to David Cameron’s renegotiation plans.
13.5.2014: "Warfare" between Eurosceptic camps: Marine Le Pen, leader of France's National Front (FN), has accused Nigel Farage of the UK Independence Party of "aggression" against her party, for labelling it racist. Mr Farage had rejected ties with the FN for its "anti-Semitism and general prejudice". View (in context)
12.5.2014: The European Parliamentary Research Service published a compilation of Voting advice applications (VAA), tools designed to help make an informed decision in the upcoming EP elections.
In addition to national applications designed for European elections, there are several pan-European tools to discover the current political landscape. Electio2014, MyVote2014 and euandi are three examples of such tools. View
13.5.2014: "Warfare" between Eurosceptic camps: Marine Le Pen, leader of France's National Front (FN), has accused Nigel Farage of the UK Independence Party of "aggression" against her party, for labelling it racist. Mr Farage had rejected ties with the FN for its "anti-Semitism and general prejudice". View (in context)
12.5.2014: The European Parliamentary Research Service published a compilation of Voting advice applications (VAA), tools designed to help make an informed decision in the upcoming EP elections.
In addition to national applications designed for European elections, there are several pan-European tools to discover the current political landscape. Electio2014, MyVote2014 and euandi are three examples of such tools. View
13.5.2014: Several new political forces will make their appearance in the European Parliament for the first time following the European elections, reports EurActiv. All will be "non-attached" in the beginning, but many of their MEPs will gravitate towards established political groups, becoming "kingmakers".
11.5.2014: Jean-Claude Juncker said he had won assurances from German chancellor Angela Merkel that he would become the next EC president if their centre-right bloc wins the European parliamentary elections on 22-25 May. Juncker's comments, made in an interview with Bild am Sonntag paper, contrasted with Merkel’s own suggestion on Saturday that the real choice might be made – as in the past – only after prolonged horse-trading between national governments. View
12.5.2014: YouGov surveyed over 8,000 voters in six countries participating in this month’s European elections, and found anti-EU and nationalist parties on the rise across the continent. View
12.5.2014: With two weeks to go until the European elections, Angela Merkel is reportedly trying to influence the internal functioning of the European Parliament, attempting to prevent the President of the European Parliament from chairing meetings.
8.5.2014: An Ipsos-MORI poll of almost 9,000 people across twelve EU member states has found that 62 per cent were either "not at all" or "not so much" interested in the upcoming European elections, with only 35 per cent saying they would definitely vote.
8.5.2014: European Voice reported on the "uninspired televised debate" between Schulz and Juncker on German TV (view). The two candidates were "on message and in control", unlike in previous encounters where Juncker looked "cranky and uninterested" and Schulz was "out of his depth". Full artilce (subscription)
8.5.2014: Süddeutsche reports that Bernd Lucke, leader of Germany’s anti-euro AfD party, reaffirms that he wants his party to join the European Conservatives and Reformists Group within the European Parliament – noting that he’s "in good talks" with the Czech and the Polish parties who are part of the group, while the British Conservatives have not yet agreed to the move.
3.5.2014: Guy Verhofstadt attacks tolerance of anti-europeanism
Guy Verhofstadt, ALDE group leader and Liberal and Democrat party candidate for the Commission Presidency, rejected the populism of eurosceptics and the tolerance of such overt populism within mainstream parties like the European People's Party instead of sticking up for the European Union and the need to build a closer union, especially in the fields of energy, digital and capital markets and foreign policy. Press release. (in context)
2.5.2014: After the first-ever election debate, a snap poll judged ALDE’s candidate Guy Verhofstadt to have won the contest with 55 per cent support, while the EPP’s Jean Claude Juncker – and narrow favourite to win the Presidency – was judged to be the weakest, with 9 per cent. View.
1.5.2014: Marine Le Pen launches European campaign with attack on EU. With the far-right FN aiming to spearhead an anticipated surge by populist parties across Europe in the poll, Ms Le Pen told cheering supporters that it was the “duty of patriots” to vote against Brussels. View FT article (subscription).
30.4.2014: In a Guardian blog post, Simon Jenkins cites Open Europe’s recent poll which found that 73 per cent of Britons and 58 per cent of Germans want their national parliaments to have more powers to block new EU laws, with a mere 8 per cent of Britons and 21 per cent of Germans supporting only the European Parliament having this power. View.
30.4.2014: EPP are still leading S&D by a small margin in our latest forecast: by 213 seats to 208. With just under a month to go, the election is "too close to call". View. Full Poll Watch data.
29.4.2014: Latest projections of seats in the Parliament:
Source: collaboration between the EP and TNS Opinion
28.4.2014: The European Parliament launched a page entitled "European elections - Events that will help you to decide", including an interactive timeline. View
24.4.2014: A group of pro-Europe British Conservatives has decided to launch a new party to stand in the upcoming European elections as an alternative to David Cameron’s Conservatives, and Nigel Farage’s eurosceptic UK Independence Party (UKIP): the 4 Freedoms Party (UK EPP). View.
23.4.2014: EPP remain just ahead of S&D: on 217 to 208 seats. While S&D parties have remained stable in European election polls in most countries over the past week, EPP parties have fallen slightly in France, Finland and Poland. View. Full Poll Watch data.
23.4.2014: Speaking in Brussels, the European Peoples’ Party (EPP) lead candidate and aspirant Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker insisted that the character of the elections had changed after Lisbon, and the victor would be installed in Berlaymont, the HQ of the European Commission, as President. View. (in context)
20.4.2014: In an interview with the Sunday Times (subscription), National Front leader Marie Le Pen argued that:
"We want to change the EU so that it has as little power as possible and we can recuperate as much power as possible for our country until we win power and organise a referendum on leaving the EU".
19.4.2014: In an interview with Süddeutsche, European Council President Herman van Rompuy argued that the European elections will be dominated by national factors:
"I'm no enthusiastic devotee of this idea of having leading candidates [nominated by European parliamentary groups]… this is unlikely to significantly influence voters’ behaviour."
18.4.2014: Antonio Tajani, Vice President of the European Commission in charge of Industry and entrepreneurship, will be on electoral leave from 18 April to 25 May 2014 to participate to the European Parliament elections. During his leave, Commissioner Barnier will assume temporary responsibility for his portfolio. View. (in context)
18.4.2014: Jean-Claude Juncker promised a Commission of "politicians, not bureaucrats" and calls for strengthened Franco-German relations. View.
16.4.2014: European Voice published a country-by-country guide to the European elections. View
16.4.2014: Jean-Claude Juncker the EPP candidate for the Commission presidency, has tweeted that if appointed to the post, he would ask the Finnish government to nominate Jyrki Katainen, the country’s current Prime Minister, to the Commission, and that Juncker would give him a significant portfolio. View.
As provided for in the Code of Conduct for Commissioners this leave is unpaid and during that period Commissioners may not use the human or material resources of the Commission. Press release (in context)
Dying days of 2013… what happened?!
Part I: January 2014 to April 27th (end of last Plenary)
Bit of a Part: April 28th to early June
Part III: November to December
The December European Council came and went with barely a trace of last year’s Four Presidents’ report “Towards a Genuine EMU”. About the most tangible decision of this week’s Summit was to welcome ECOFIN’s `general approach’ to the SRM. So far, they are nearly the only group which welcomed it whilst, in contrast, the European Parliament effectively declared war on ECOFIN.
European Parliament President Schulz delivered a remarkable speech to the Heads of State/Government at the opening of the Council. It was remarkable for both the uncompromising content and the fact that it was delivered by a declared candidate for the Presidency of the European Commission – an appointment in the hands of the group to whom the speech was delivered.
The forceful declaration by the President of the Parliament – bolstered “by an overwhelming majority, with support across all party lines” sets the Parliament on a dramatic collision course with ECOFIN. At this stage, it is difficult to see that a total re-structuring of the SRM proposal can be engineered in time for a vote by the final Parliament Plenary in April. So the SRM is unlikely to be enacted in 2014.
However, such a dramatic stand-off between the European Parliament and ECOFIN on the SRM issue may produce some revolutionary political fireworks influencing the European elections next May. This could convert the elections into something of a referendum on Europe’s handling of the crisis because the outcome would probably be binary:
1. Parliament backs down completely and meekly – confirming the electorate’s perceived view that it is a body that does not matter (so why bother to turn out to vote?). Amidst a low turnout, the anti-Europeans do well and the new Parliament stymies further integration, thus risking unravelling the revolutionary economic governance developments of the past three years.
2. The Member States back down – and confirm a real shift in power to `Europe’ and away from the States. Electors should then realise that it is worth voting for a body that can represent them against the power of even the biggest states.
Some major pieces of legislation reached political agreement between the co-legislators (Council and Parliament) amidst the Christmas rush but agreement failed to be reached on the SRM (see above) and also MiFID. So the early part of 2014 will be dominated by the attempts to wrap up these dossiers before the Parliament going into recess.
Date |
Council |
Parliament |
Commission |
||
|
European Council |
ECOFIN |
Plenary |
ECON |
|
9 January |
|
|
|
meeting |
|
13-16 January |
|
|
|
extraordinary meetings /hearing on troika report |
|
13-16 January |
|
|
plenary |
|
|
22-23 January |
|
|
|
meeting |
|
27 January |
|
|
|
meeting |
|
28 January |
|
meeting |
|
|
|
29 January |
|
|
|
|
Greens announce two leading candidates for COM president |
30 January |
|
|
|
meeting |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 February |
|
|
|
|
ALDE Congress |
3-6 February |
|
|
plenary |
|
|
12-13 February |
|
|
|
meeting |
|
17 February |
|
|
|
meeting |
|
18 February |
|
meeting |
|
|
|
20 February |
|
|
|
meeting |
|
21-23 February |
|
|
|
|
Greens electoral congress |
24-27 February |
|
|
plenary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 March |
|
|
|
meeting |
|
5 March |
|
|
|
|
last day to submit EPP candidature for COM pres. |
6 March |
|
|
|
|
EPP Dublin Congress |
10-13 March |
|
|
plenary |
|
|
11 March |
|
meeting |
|
|
|
17-18 March |
|
|
|
meeting |
|
20-21 March |
European Council meeting |
|
|
|
|
24-25 March |
|
|
|
meeting |
|
March |
|
|
|
|
Expert Group on DRF and Eurobills reports to Commission |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 April |
|
|
|
meeting |
|
1-2 April |
|
informal meeting |
|
|
|
2-3 April |
|
|
plenary (Brussels) |
|
|
7 April |
|
|
|
meeting |
VP Rehn to take electoral leave |
14-17 April |
|
|
last plenary |
|
|
17 April |
Lewandowski to take leave for EP campaign (until elections) | ||||
19 April | Six further Commissioners to take electoral leave |
The 'political families’ in the European Parliament will select their candidates for the Commission Presidency – but it is far from automatic that the candidate of the largest grouping will become Commission President (see New Commission President)
Table
Date |
Council |
Parliament |
Commission |
||
|
European Council |
ECOFIN |
Plenary |
ECON |
|
6 May |
|
meeting |
|
|
|
8 May |
debate on German TV between Commission presidency candidates Martin Schulz and Jean-Claude Juncker | ||||
15 May |
European Braodcasting Union plans debate with all nominated candidates | ||||
15-16 May |
European Council meeting (tbc) |
|
|
|
|
22-25 May |
|
|
EP elections |
|
|
25 May | end of Commissioners' electoral leave | ||||
informal meeting to discuss course for appointment of next Council President, HR and Commission President |
|
|
|
|
|
20 June |
|
meeting |
|
|
|
26 June |
informal dinner of Member State leaders |
||||
26-27 June |
European Council meeting |
|
|
|
|
Source: European Parliament
Once the Parliament goes into recess, the action moves to the electors of the Member States. The seat distribution chart above illustrates the fine political balance of the current Parliament. The number of seats will fall from the current 766 to 751. Before the constitutive plenary session in July, the newly elected MEPs will come together and meet according to political affiliations. The official political groups forming the Parliament should be created by late June.
The precise political composition of the new Parliament will not only have a major influence on some EU policy (PollWatch video) but also on the choice of the next President of the European Commission, and then on to the complexion of the new Commission as a whole. It is NOT the prerogative of the largest grouping to name its candidate forthwith as President. (See comment below). The potential for a higher (or lower) turnout will make forecasts of the outcome particularly difficult.
According to media reports, Herman Van Rompuy, the president of the European Council, has convened an informal meeting of the EU's national leaders on the evening of 27 May, two days after elections to the European Parliament end, with the purpose of charting a course for the smooth appointment of key posts such as Council President, High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (currently Baroness Ashton) and new president of the European Commission.
In December 2013, the Parliament voted a resolution on 'multi-tier governance’ link that provides for the possibility of an EMU sub-committee of the new Parliament.
Date |
Council |
Parliament |
Commission |
||
|
European Council |
ECOFIN |
Plenary |
ECON |
|
1-3 July |
|
|
Constituent part-session, election of EP president, vice-presidents and quaestors |
|
|
7-10 July | official political group meetings, election of standing committees’ chairs and vice-chairs | ||||
14-17 July |
|
|
plenary, election of Commission President |
|
|
22 July |
|
|
|
meeting |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3-4 September |
|
|
|
meeting |
|
15-18 September |
|
|
plenary |
|
|
22-23 September |
|
|
|
meeting |
|
30 September |
|
|
|
meeting |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 October |
|
|
|
meeting |
|
8-9 October |
|
|
plenary (Brussels) |
|
|
13 October |
|
|
|
meeting |
|
20-23 October |
|
|
plenary |
|
|
31 October 2014 |
|
|
|
|
End of the current Commission's term of office |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Candidates for the Presidency of the European Parliament may be proposed either by a political group or by a minimum of forty MEPs. The election is held on the first session day by secret paper ballot.
September: The Commissioners-designate appear before the parliamentary committee(s) relevant to their prospective fields of responsibility. The hearings are held in public. Afterwards, each committee meets in camera to draft its evaluation of the candidate's expertise and performance, which is sent to the President of the Parliament. In the past, these hearings have led to candidate commissioners withdrawing or having their portfolio changed.
October (tbc): After this vetting process, the Commission's President presents the full College of Commissioners and its programme at a session of Parliament. The Commission President, the High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and other members of the Commission need to be approved by a vote of consent by Parliament. If Parliament approves the President and Commissioners, they can be appointed by the Council, acting by qualified majority.
The political families of the European Parliament are talking in terms of their absolute right to elect the next President of the European Commission. The political colour of the President may be crucial to the general flavour of legislation on economic and finance for the next five years as the President has a powerful influence on the choice of personnel as Commissioner and the allocation of portfolios. But the situation is not quite so simple! The actual test is that the candidate has to achieve the support of a majority of the all the Members of the European Parliament – not just those actually voting. So the largest political family will not necessarily be able to take the post as there will be much negotiation to assemble a majority in the Parliament.
Article 17 .7. “Taking into account the elections to the European Parliament and after having held the appropriate consultations, the European Council, acting by a qualified majority, shall propose to the European Parliament a candidate for President of the Commission. This candidate shall be elected by the European Parliament by a majority of its component members. If he does not obtain the required majority, the European Council, acting by a qualified majority, shall within one month propose a new candidate who shall be elected by the European Parliament following the same procedure.”
This is probably the key role as far as investors are concerned. Commissioner Rehn was made a Vice President of the Commission in recognition of the growing importance of the role as the crisis wore on. The new governance procedures give the Commission’s economic judgements great influence on the fine balance of policies on austerity and competitiveness – perhaps at the expense of `social Europe’. That balance will be a key issue for investors during the next Commission.
For the financial services industry, the key Commissioner is the Internal Market portfolio. However, for many Commission’s past there has been a debate about whether to split off the financial services parts and fold them into DG ECFIN - in charge of economic matters. In the end, this is a choice for the new Commission President. Given the rising influence of the Economic Commissioner as the de facto Finance Minster of Europe, the new President would need to be particularly confident to add further powers to the `Finance Minister’.
Typically, the new Commissioner has taken stock of what is left over from the predecessor and then started a review of what has to be done. That points to a new programme in spring 2015 that will have to deal with long-term investing, shadow banking and the Liikanen agenda on the very structure of banks. But any drive to enhance the role of capital market finance could well influence market prices so investors should also pay attention to this choice
(Note to UK: the requirement that Commissioner candidates must have a “European commitment” may limit the field as the Parliament would probably reject any candidate with a significantly sceptic background.)
Article 17 .7 para 2 “The Council, by common accord with the President-elect, shall adopt the list of the other persons whom it proposes for appointment as members of the Commission. They shall be selected, on the basis of the suggestions made by Member States, in accordance with the criteria set out in paragraph 3, second subparagraph (The members of the Commission shall be chosen on the ground of their general competence and European commitment from persons whose independence is beyond doubt.)…”
The European Council of December 2013 gave Council President van Rompuy a final mandate for resolving the long-running topic of mutually agreed contracts for economic performance. Crucially the linkage with `solidarity mechanisms’ opens up many possibilities for a major re-shaping of the euro area economic system – or not.
European Council Conclusions – December 2013
37. The European Council invites the President of the European Council, in close cooperation with the President of the European Commission, to carry work forward on a system of mutually agreed contractual arrangements and associated solidarity mechanisms, on the basis of the orientations above, and to report to the October 2014 European Council with a view to reaching an overall agreement.
Date |
Council |
Parliament |
Commission |
||
|
European Council |
ECOFIN |
Plenary |
ECON |
|
1st November |
|
|
|
|
New Commission takes office |
3-4 November |
|
|
|
meeting |
|
11 November |
|
|
|
meeting |
|
12-13 November |
|
|
plenary (Brussels) |
|
|
17 November |
|
|
|
meeting |
|
24-27 November |
|
|
plenary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st December |
new Council president to take up office |
|
|
|
|
1-2 December |
|
|
|
meeting |
|
8 December |
|
|
|
meeting |
|
15-18 December |
|
|
plenary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Article 15 of the TFEU provides for the European Council to elect its President by qualified majority for a term of two-and-a-half years, renewable once. There are no Treaty-based criteria for this office, except that the President cannot simultaneously hold national office. The new post holder will take office on 1 December 2014.
It seems unlikely that the current President will stand again and the name of French Finance Minister Moscovici is already being canvassed, especially if Barnier does not become Commission President.