On Thursday morning, members on the Foreign Affairs and International Trade Committees held a first joint meeting on the new EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement, intensifying the parliamentary scrutiny process of the deal reached by EU and British negotiators on 24 December.
MEPs welcomed the agreement as a good
solution, albeit thin. A no-deal would have brought a disaster for
citizens and companies on both sides, speakers emphasized. At the same
time, they stressed that the parliamentary scrutiny of this deal must go
beyond mere ratification, insisting on thorough access to information
and a clear role for Parliament in the implementation and future
monitoring of the agreement.
In addition, members also highlighted
the importance of fostering a close dialogue between the European
Parliament and Westminster on future EU-UK relations.
They regretted that many aspects,
including the Erasmus programme, foreign policy, security and defence
cooperation, were not included in the negotiations on the future
partnership. Some expressed concern about the future for environmental
standards, as the new UK emissions trading system has only been in place
since 1 January without clarity on how to link it up with the EU one.
Rapporteurs’ remarks
Kati Piri
(AFET, S&D, NL) said: “Parliament’s red lines will continue to be
central in the scrutiny process. I welcome the fact that the EU managed
to secure a single, clear governance framework. This will allow EU and
British citizens, consumers and businesses legal certainty about the
applicable rules and will ensure robust compliance guarantees by the
parties.
“At the same time, it is also important
to be frank: we did not want or choose Brexit. So it is with regret and
sadness that we acknowledge that this was the democratic choice of the
British people. And sadly, the agreement itself falls far short of the Political Declaration that UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson himself signed just months prior to the negotiations.”
Christophe Hansen
(INTA, EPP, LU) said: “It is a very thin agreement. But I welcome the
fact that there are no quotas and tariffs, and with that we avoided
falling back to WTO rules that would have hurt a lot of our sectors,
including agriculture and cars.
“I regret very much that the UK decided
not to take part in Erasmus. This jeopardises the future for 170,000
Europeans in the UK and 100,000 UK students in the EU. I also regret
that future Geographical Indications are not covered, which is contrary
to the Political Declaration.
“I would have liked that services were
reflected somewhat broader in the agreement. Nevertheless, regulatory
cooperation on financial services will be negotiated until March.
“It is important not to let the consent
drag on forever. Provisional application is not the legal security that
businesses and citizens deserve after all these years.”
Next steps
The two committees will in due course
vote on the consent proposal prepared by the two standing rapporteurs to
allow for a plenary vote before the end of the provisional application
of the agreement.
In addition to the plenary vote,
Parliament will also vote on an accompanying resolution prepared by the
political groups in the UK Coordination Group and the Conference of Presidents.
Background
The new Trade and Cooperation agreement
has been provisionally applied since 1 January 2021. For it to enter
into force permanently, it requires the consent of the Parliament.
Parliament has repeatedly expressed that it considers the current
provisional application to be the result of a set of unique
circumstances and an exercise not to be repeated.
MEPs on the International Trade
Committee held a first meeting on the new EU-UK deal on Monday 11
January, during which they promised thorough scrutiny of the agreement.
Read more here.