The common perception of Brexit as a failed project might change over time, implying that its domino effect could still rear its ugly head.
The British vote to leave the European
Union on 23 June 2016 sent a shockwave through the other member states.
At the time, the Leave campaign’s success triggered fears of a domino
effect that would unravel the EU project. But against all expectations,
Brexit has neither fuelled anti-EU sentiments
among Europeans nor emboldened political leaders to demand their own
country’s exit. On the contrary, the divisive nature of the British
debate and the reality of Brexit has had a deterrent effect.
Nevertheless,
the Brexit domino effect could still return if Boris Johnson continues
to escape any accountability and retells the Brexit story uncontested.
The reverse domino effect
From
the continent, Brexit continues to look like an act of self-harm with
severe economic and political costs, including the distinct possibility
that it might actually pave the way for the break-up of the United
Kingdom. While the EU is also weakened by the loss of one of its largest
member states, the impact is less severe as it secured an agreement
that safeguards its vital interests. Brexit remains an existential
challenge for the UK but manageable for the EU.
This is partly
thanks to how the EU handled the issue. Faced with a potentially
existential threat, the EU displayed an unprecedented level of unity,
with member states gathering behind the European Commission’s
negotiating strategy. The excruciating British debate highlighted the
economic and political costs of being a third country – that EU
membership matters –, leaving the remaining members with a sense of
vindication. However, the EU should be careful not to become too
complacent and continue to pay close attention to the EU–UK relationship, as the feared domino effect may still rear its ugly head .
Shaping the Brexit narrative
The
EU clearly has a desire to close this regrettable chapter of European
(dis-)integration and relegate the EU–UK relationship to a third-order
issue, preferably to be dealt with by the Trade and Cooperation
Agreement’s (TCA) technical committees. But recent disputes, be it on COVID-19 vaccine supply chains
or the implementation of the Northern Ireland Protocol, have
demonstrated that both sides’ political engagement, and not just
technical management, will be needed.
The EU’s UK strategy
should account for a partner whose approach to EU–UK relations, and
therefore to problem-solving, remains above all political and firmly
focused on the domestic audience. The current UK government, supported
by parts of the British media, will continue to politicise its
relationship with the EU and weave the narrative of Brexit as a success
story. For the sake of his political survival, Boris Johnson will paint
every British success as a Brexit dividend and blame any negative impact
on the EU.
Meanwhile, Brexit will drop off the EU27’s agenda.
This will make it more difficult for the EU bodies monitoring the EU–UK
relationship (e.g. the newly established Service for the EU–UK
Agreements, or UKS) to cut through the noise and communicate a unified
message in the face of European ‘Brexit fatigue’ and other, more
pressing priorities. Consequently, the UK narrative will be largely
uncontested....
more at EPC
© European Policy Centre EPC
Key
Hover over the blue highlighted
text to view the acronym meaning
Hover
over these icons for more information
Comments:
No Comments for this Article