The UK’s withdrawal from the EU has created a policy, legal and operational vacuum in migration and asylum matters which undermines the interests of both sides. There is no more binding framework which defines responsibility for asylum seekers and facilitates transfers between the EU and the UK.
Brexit also made it harder to devise and
implement effective anti-smuggling strategies with European partners.
Despite
these gaps, a post-Brexit cooperation agreement is not on the horizon,
with structural reforms pursued by each side reflecting conflicting
priorities and a growing political disconnect. Following the 2020
proposals of the New Pact on Migration and Asylum, EU member states are
still negotiating a mandatory responsibility-sharing mechanism.
Meanwhile, in April 2022, the UK overhauled its asylum and immigration
law, undercutting safeguards for asylum seekers reaching the country
irregularly. The same month, the UK government signed a deal with Rwanda
to deport all asylum seekers arriving via the Channel – a move even the
European Commission has criticised.
Recent post-Brexit tensions
over other policy areas, most prominently the Northern Ireland Protocol,
have reduced mutual trust to a historic minimum. This makes an
ambitious and comprehensive agreement over asylum and migration matters
an unlikely prospect for the time being. Yet, as neighbours, the EU and
the UK will continue to depend on each other to pursue their respective
policy objectives in migration and asylum.
So, despite living
separately and facing numerous unresolved tensions, the EU and the UK
can and should pursue a post-Brexit cooperation framework in these
matters. Otherwise, they will both be worse off.
As a first step, the two sides should focus on rebuilding trust.
This can be achieved by pursuing less contentious goals within
immediate reach, such as enhanced anti-smuggling efforts, while also
diffusing political tensions across the board. Once an atmosphere of
sincere cooperation is restored, as a second step, the EU and the UK
should define a broader and more ambitious partnership. Safe and legal channels from the EU to the UK should be re-established.
At
the same time, equitable solutions for facilitating the return of
third-country nationals from the UK to the EU, in full respect of
procedural safeguards, should also be found. Although reciprocity would
have to be at the heart of this new arrangement, the EU and the UK
should go beyond a transactional approach, particularly by strengthening
protection pathways and burden-sharing solutions, including with third
countries, in line with their international commitments.
The
European Commission should take the lead in the negotiation of a
post-Brexit EU–UK cooperation framework. This would allow the EU to
speak with one voice and pursue clear and coherent objectives across the
different policy areas concerned. The newly established EU–UK
Parliamentary Partnership Assembly should also be involved in the
negotiations, helping to democratise the process and achieve a more
balanced relationship in the interests of both sides.
Read the full paper here.
EPC
© European Policy Centre EPC
Key
Hover over the blue highlighted
text to view the acronym meaning
Hover
over these icons for more information
Comments:
No Comments for this Article