Follow Us

Follow us on Twitter  Follow us on LinkedIn

News

Summer holidays from today … back on 9th September! I wish all my readers Happy Holidays – wherever you are allowed to go!

Why not try our new service? Brexit and the City - the Impact

"Brexit has ended the Golden Age of the City" video with Federal Trust Director Brendan Donnelly

Brexit and the City of London: April 2021 Video Update

 

02 January 2018

Financial Times: Brussels brushes off UK charm offensive aimed at EU banks


Default: Change to:


Brussels has brushed off UK proposals to smooth the way for European financial institutions to stay in the City of London after Brexit, arguing that the British plans fall short of the EU’s own market access provisions.


An EU official said that the British charm offensive, rolled out this week to reassure European investment banks and other firms that they will not face big new burdens after the UK leaves the bloc, was less generous and more heavy-handed than the current EU system of equivalence.

This allows financial institutions outside the EU to sell services within the bloc as long as the European Commission deems that they are subject to home-country regulations that are “equivalent” to the EU’s own rules.

The official said that the proposals by the Bank of England and the British government did not go as far as the EU’s system, adding that it “is not equivalence plus. If anything it is equivalence minus.”

The British plans were devised to counter the risk that European financial institutions might reduce activities in the UK in favour of EU centres such as Frankfurt and Paris after Brexit.

Like the EU’s own system, Britain’s model would make access conditional on the other side — in this instance the EU — maintaining robust supervision and regulation of its financial sector. But the EU official said that some of the UK requirements — on issues such as information sharing between EU and British supervisors — went beyond what Brussels requires.

The UK will “require quite significant oversight of the parent [company],” the official said.

The EU system also allows substantial cross-border provision of services, meaning no local establishment is needed.

By contrast, the UK proposals are based around the idea that EU investment banks and other non-deposit taking institutions will be able to keep operating in the UK if they maintain branches. This would absolve them of the need of setting up locally regulated and supervised subsidiaries — a more complicated and expensive endeavour.

 

The streamlined access proposed by Britain would be conditional on the EU making sure European financial supervisors share information with UK authorities, and on Europe maintaining high standards of regulation and supervision. [...]

Full article on Financial Times (subscription required)



© Financial Times


< Next Previous >
Key
 Hover over the blue highlighted text to view the acronym meaning
Hover over these icons for more information



Add new comment