Brussels insists on wresting lucrative business from London as derivatives houses fear threat to stability
Brussels has rebuffed industry calls to rethink its plan for grabbing lucrative clearing business from the City of London, saying it needs to proceed to ensure robust markets in Europe. Mairead McGuinness, the financial services commissioner, defended the EU strategy to build up euro-denominated clearing, saying this proposal was vital to the bloc’s “financial resilience”.
The commission faces mounting pressure from leading derivatives houses to rethink EU plans to wrest euro-denominated clearing from London. McGuinness was speaking to the Financial Times after two days of meetings in London, where she held talks with counterparts on boosting collaboration in other areas of financial services.
Clearing houses cut market risk by standing between two parties in a trade. They have been a big battleground since Brexit, as the EU seeks to build up its capital markets infrastructure and improve its regulators’ oversight of the vast euro-denominated derivatives market.
Clearing is the only area where the EU has granted London temporary “equivalence” since Brexit, allowing the City’s clearing powerhouse to continue handling euro-denominated swaps trades that stand at more than €130tn. The EU plan sets June 30 2025 as the cut-off date for its “equivalence” decision, but industry players are warning this represents a threat to financial stability.
The UK government privately believes that the commission will have to — inevitably — delay the end-date by several years. British government officials said UK ministers expected the EU to extend CCP equivalence further “out of self-interest”, given that letting the current equivalence expire could create “financial stability risk” for the continent. A further extension of the deadline would not only benefit the EU after the takeover of Credit Suisse and several US bank failures but would also reflect improving relations between London and Brussels, they argued.
But McGuinness said the EU’s date was aimed at ensuring no “cliff-edge” faced the industry and that it gave the EU time to put its house in order. “I want to underline that this matter is actually not so much about Brexit. The EU needs — for its own sake — safe, robust and attractive clearing for a well-functioning [capital markets union],” McGuinness said...
more at FT
© FT plc
Key
Hover over the blue highlighted
text to view the acronym meaning
Hover
over these icons for more information
Comments:
No Comments for this Article