Follow Us

Follow us on Twitter  Follow us on LinkedIn

Article List:

 

30 June 2011

ESMA publishes the last annual report of CESR


2010 marked the last year of CESR's existence. The Committee of European Securities Regulators has been replaced, after nine years of existence, by ESMA, the European Securities and Markets Authority. This last annual report for CESR sets out the work done by the Committee during the year 2010.

In order to ensure CESR’s readiness to become ESMA, 2010 saw a lot of internal preparatory work in terms of organisation, but also in terms of policy. CESR reviewed its internal organisation and started designing future policies and procedures for ESMA. In its policy advice to the European Commission, CESR included recommendations on how best to prepare ESMA’s role in the different pieces of legislation that make up the EU framework for securities supervision in Europe.

2010 was indeed a challenging year: CESR worked hard on finalising advice on a great variety of policy issues stemming from work already started earlier, or directly following up on issues that have arisen during or after the financial crisis. A key area for CESR was to continue the implementation of the EU Regulation on Credit Rating Agencies. CESR laid the groundwork for the key role ESMA will have in this respect. Different types of guidance were put forward that are aimed at explaining and facilitating both regulators and those being regulated to comply properly with the new rules. 2010 even saw an important step forward in this respect with the registration of the first Credit Rating Agency in Europe; further applications are currently being processed. CESR also started building a central repository for ratings and, overall, found the US and Japanese supervisory regimes for rating agencies equivalent to EU rules. All these were important steps towards a direct supervision of credit rating agencies by ESMA. The ongoing financial crisis revealed the role CRAs play in contributing to market integrity. CESR prepared the ground for an effective regulation in Europe so as to ensure the rating process becomes more transparent and investors are protected properly.

Of course, the CRA Regulation was not the only important policy area on which CESR contributed in 2010. There was also considerable work undertaken on another cornerstone of Europe’s securities markets legislation: the MiFID, the Directive which was reviewed, provides the regulatory framework for trading in European financial instruments. In 2010, CESR published two sets of advice recommending the European Commission to overhaul the Directive’s legal framework in order to adapt to changed market realities. This work of the Committee represented the results of two years of continuous fact-finding and of assessing the impacts of MiFID on securities markets. CESR identified those areas where amendments and changes to the legal framework might be needed. Overall, MiFID increased market competition by opening up the field to other trading venues than exchanges, which in and of itself is a very good thing. There are, however, some diverse consequences, such as an increased opacity and fragmentation in trading data. The new MiFID II framework will seek to address these issues. Not only were the rules governing the actual trading a key focus for CESR in 2010, but also on post-trading issues - 2010 was a demanding year for CESR. Following the regulatory roadmap laid out by the G20 in 2010, a proposal for a regulation on OTC derivatives, an area still largely unregulated, CCPs and trade repositories was adopted by the European Commission. CESR started preparatory work for future technical standards, as such responsibility is expected to be assigned to ESMA.

Another area of continued work in 2010 was the regulation of the fund industry, the so-called UCITS. Following CESR’s advice on the implementing measures of the revised UCITS Directive in 2009, in 2010 CESR’s focus was more on giving a common EU definition of money market funds, the risk measurement of UCITS generally, and elaborating further the requirements on Key Investor Information (KID). The KID document will replace the Simplified Prospectus soon, facilitating investors’ investment decisions and ensuring consistency of information across Europe. Generally, making financial information easier to understand has always been an important part of CESR’s agenda. In this regard, the implementation of the KID will be an important step forward in setting a new benchmark for effective retail investor information. In addition, CESR also worked to improve financial information by monitoring and ensuring CESR’s advice was heard in the international financial reporting community, in particular regarding accounting standards for financial instruments.

As much as consistency of rules for securities across Europe is important, it is also crucial for rules across the different financial sectors to converge. The more integrated and innovative banking, securities and insurance conglomerates get, the more regulators have to work together on these issues. This was well reflected by the increase in joint work on cross-sector issues at the level three sector Committees, CESR, CEBS and CEIOPS, in 2010. The set-up of the new European supervisory architecture will formalise this cooperation even further. The new supervisory structure seeks to establish a common EU rule book, but also to put in place a real common supervisory culture. Finally, I also would like to take this opportunity to thank all the individuals, and they are numerous, that contributed to a successful 2010 for CESR. My thanks go to my colleague supervisors from the Member States, to the technical experts working on all the policy issues mentioned, and of course to all of CESR’s staff led by the Secretary General, Carlo Comporti. Without the joint effort and the continuous commitment of each and everybody, CESR could not have achieved so much and this has established a solid foundation for ESMA now to build even more intensively on.

Full Annual report



© ESMA


< Next Previous >
Key
 Hover over the blue highlighted text to view the acronym meaning
Hover over these icons for more information



Add new comment